Still trying to get the facts about the status of the Collins/King effort to undermine the EPA's Clean Power Plan.
Meanwhile, a slew of environmental organizations including League of Conservation Voters, National Resource Defense Council and Sierra Club are out with a strong joint statement blasting the amendment:
The amendment would require that federal policy shall "reflect the carbon neutrality of forest bioenergy." This requirement would result in substantial damage to forests and climate by undermining the scientific process established by the EPA...Cutting and burning our forests to generate electricity is not "carbon neutral." Per megawatt-hour, wood- burning power plants emit more CO2 than fossil-fueled plants...this amendment would therefore sanction and promote high-carbon sources of energy in federal policy, undermining the gains we are poised to make under the Clean Power Plan, the Paris Accord, and other climate policies.
Moreover, this amendment amounts to legislative interference with what should be a science-based policy...
This amendment is an environmentally damaging and scientifically indefensible approach to biomass policy.
1 comment:
King and Collins are well aware that biomass is not climate safe.
One has to wonder if they are any better than their counterparts from coal or oil states who put their campaign contributions ahead of human life.
Post a Comment